Locus announces Internet-based environmental software suite

WALNUT CREEK, Calif., 17 December 1999 — Locus Technologies (Locus) announced today that it has designed, developed, and implemented an Internet-based information delivery, transaction, and remote-control platform for the environmental industry.

Locus’s suite of Internet-based technologies, named LocusFocus, and Environmental Information Management™ (EIM™), includes document management, project scheduling, and cost-control capabilities, as well as more sophisticated applications, such as web browser-based automation of the monitoring and control of treatment systems, a comprehensive environmental data management system, and data input and retrieval via hand-held wireless devices, such as a 3Com Palm Pilot™.

Locus believes a significant opportunity exists to leverage the power of the Internet to provide secure, open, and universally accessible network services for the environmental industry that connect participants; automate the flow of information; enable individuals to monitor and control environmental treatment systems remotely; and provide for the upload, download, and/or display of analytical and sampling information for groundwater, soil, and air.

Based on their successful use on several large, active remediation sites, Locus believes its applications have the potential to create significant improvements in the way that information is used by the environmental industry, leading to improved work flow, better decision-making, and, ultimately, higher-quality project management at significant cost savings. “We have given our clients a system that is much more efficient to operate and maintain and that reduces their costs,” said Dr. Neno Duplancic, President and CEO of Locus Technologies.

Locus also announced that Dr. Daniel Rehak, a professor at Carnegie-Mellon University, has been retained as a technical consultant. Dr. Rehak has significant experience in the development and application of database-driven Internet technologies. Among his many accomplishments, he is one of the principals in charge of the creation and implementation of Carnegie-Mellon’s Internet-based course delivery system.

“While the environmental sector is clearly lucrative and growing steadily on a global scale, it is also highly inefficient, archaic, and fragmented. Locus’s services using Internet-based technologies bring necessary discipline to data organization and reporting in a fragmented environmental industry information management market,” Duplancic added.

Environmental firms steadily ease into the next stage of their development

ENR Magazine

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif., 5 July 1999 — By Andrew G. Wright, Debra K. Rubin, Mary B.Powers, Sherie Winston, William J. Angelo, Stephen H. Daniels and Paul Rosta

The environmental market could be called the other E-business. ENR’s 1999 Top 200 Environmental Firms bear little resemblance to Amazon.com, ebay and other high-flying, Internet-driven, high-tech ventures. The ENR 200 are not rewriting conventional economic theory, spinning out lucrative IPOs almost weekly or creating an expanding class of 20-something millionaires.

No, this realm is a bit more staid: plain as dirt, elemental as air and water and about as sexy as hauling out the trash. Its business still is judged in conventional terms. Clients expect tangible results. Big government clients like the Dept. of Defense and the Dept. of Energy are pushing harder than ever before to see quantifiable progress in cleaning up their contaminated sites. Industrial clients who want to concentrate on their own core businesses are trying to outsource to outside specialists, as much as possible, the management of waste-stream byproducts. For the service provider, keeping the client in compliance with state and federal regulations is more than a goal—it is a prerequisite to getting the deal.

Likewise, municipalities face the twin challenges of expanding populations and ever-stricter state and federal standards for water and wastewater treatment. These owners expect their design engineers and contractors to provide infrastructure that will surpass established benchmarks for quality, durability and costs.

The older E-business has grown steadily since 1970, the year marking the first Earth Day observance, the establishment of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the enactment of the Clean Air Act. Public support for a cleaner environment, aided by a regulatory jump start, created a robust new service sector that enjoyed a period in the late 1970s and 1980s as a Wall Street darling. Those golden days of green may be gone forever, but what remains is a legitimate, steadily expanding global economic sector. In 1998, the Top 200 market totaled $26.7 billion in revenue, adding $2.6 billion to the previous year’s total, an increase of nearly 11%. Once again, hazardous waste, water and wastewater treatment dominated this year’s list, accounting for 70% of the total market.

Consolidation and acquisition, trends that marked previous years, again were catch phrases in 1998. At the top of the heap for the second year is U.S. Filter, reporting nearly $5 billion in revenue, up from $2.9 billion in 1997. The master consolidators devoured enough small fry to position itself for a $6.2-billion buyout by Vivendi, the French utility and media conglomerate (ENR 4/5 p. 16).

Palm Desert, Calif.-based U.S. Filter is “now in the process of integrating GDE (Generale des Eaux),” Vivendi’s global water and wastewater treatment arm, says U.S. Filter President Richard J. Heckman. “We’ll have one big company at the end of the summer…a $13-billion company,” he says, approaching the size of Coca Cola, with 80,000 employees in 120 countries. Heckman says the world market for water is $300 billion a year and “that’s low. If Walmart sells $100 billion worth of goods, I have a hard time believing all the water in the world is only three times that.”

It can be perilous being near the top of the Top 200, however. Consider Philip Environmental Services Group, a Canadian consolidator whose two-year buying spree pushed it into third place last year. Dropping off the ENR Top 200 is the least of the firm’s woes. Accounting and inventory irregularities triggered a spate of lawsuits and a stock swoon that landed Philip in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. The company received permission to extend its reorganization plan filing to June 30. Another part of the workout involved a $70-million May sale of Philip’s utility management arm to Azurix, Houston-based Enron’s entry into the water business. Having just completed its own initial public stock offering, Azurix is concentrating on building the same credibility in water that Enron claims in oil and gas.

The ‘Other’ E-Biz Continues to Grow

Engineering News Record

Read the Press Release Here

Locus Technologies announces formation of Automation and Environmental Information Management groups and staff additions

WALNUT CREEK, Calif., 29 June 1999 — Locus Technologies announced today formation of Automation and Data Management Groups. Both groups will employ Internet based technologies to manage and control vast amounts of data generated at the company’s client sites.

Locus also announced the appointment of Steven McEvoy, P.E., to the position of Director, Automation Group, and Gregory Buckle, Ph.D., to the position of Director, Data Management, both newly created positions.

McEvoy, 33, has been with the company since its inception and has led the development of the company’s state-of-the-art automation technology for control and management of environmental treatment systems via the Internet. The technology is currently employed to control groundwater treatment systems for Locus’s clients, including Schlumberger, FMC, and Union Pacific Railroad. McEvoy holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of Alberta. McEvoy will head Locus’s Automation Group, a team of experienced electrical, mechanical, and computer science engineers, including Dr. Robert Campbell, who also joins the company this week from the General Electric Company. Campbell holds a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Stanford University and an M.S. degree from the University of Alberta. He will be managing the development of a second generation browser-based project archival database.

Buckle, 48, will head Locus’s data management systems and brings to Locus more than 20 years of experience in the environmental industry, specializing in surface and groundwater hydrology, including 9 years in environmental database management. Most recently, Buckle was the lead developer and designer of the IT Group’s environmental data management system. He holds a Ph.D. in biology from Kansas University, an M.S. in civil engineering from University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and a B.A. from Stanford University. Buckle will be responsible for development and operation of Locus’s Internet-based Environmental Information Management (EIMTM) system.

“Locus is aggressively moving downstream from site cleanups to management and control of large amounts of data that are generated by the environmental industry, using Internet based technologies. The company has a head-start on Internet technology and plans to capitalize on this position in a fragmented environmental industry information management market. Ultimately, Locus plans to commercialize these technologies,” said Dr. Neno Duplancic, President and Chief Executive Officer of Locus. “Greg and Steve’s experiences as a leaders in environmental data management, automation, and control technologies will ensure our success in this rapidly growing field,” Duplancic added.

Locus Technologies completes due diligence of Ascometal plants in France

WALNUT CREEK, CA., 25 May 1999 — Usinor, the world’s second largest steelmaker, concluded an agreement on May 14, 1999, for the sale of Ascométal to the Italian steelmaker Lucchini S.p.A. Aster, the Usinor group’s wholly owned holding company for specialty steels businesses, will sell 100 percent of Ascométal and its Safe subsidiary to Lucchini. Locus Technologies (Locus) today announced that they acted as consultant to Lucchini S.p.A for environmental due diligence of Ascométal plants in France. Ascométal produces special long-steel products, and Safe is its forging subsidiary. Together, the two companies had 1998 net sales of 750 million euros, representing 7 percent of Usinor’s consolidated sales. Ascométal, with four electric furnace steel production units and four transformation and distribution facilities, sold 1.1 million metric tons of rolled long-steel products in 1998.

Lucchini SpA had consolidated sales of 990 million euros in 1998 and a production of approximately 2 million metric tons of rolled long-steel products. Lucchini is a European leader in the special long-products segment.

“This is obviously an important development for Locus,” said Neno Duplancic, President and CEO of Locus Technologies. “It demonstrates our competitive position and ability to provide due diligence and other environmental services in Europe. We are happy that our contribution to environmental due diligence helped close this important transaction for our client.” With this project, Locus continues its expansion into Europe.

Locus Technologies awarded remediation system installation at Union Pacific Railroad Yard in Tracy, CA.

WALNUT CREEK, Calif., 5 May 1999 — Locus Technologies today announced that they were awarded a contract for groundwater remediation system installation at Union Pacific Railroad’s yard in Tracy, CA.

The remediation project will be managed in four phases: (1) construction of the infiltration trench, (2) construction of the extraction wells, (3) installation of the treatment system, and (4) system automation. As a leader in the field of groundwater treatment and automation, Locus will apply the most advanced techniques for installation of mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, and control systems.

Locus Technologies is thrilled to have the opportunity to install an advanced automated groundwater treatment system at UPRR’s Tracy Yard. This is the third in a series of UPRR groundwater treatment system automation projects awarded to Locus Technologies in recent months. “It clearly demonstrates that Locus’s state-of-the-art Internet-based automation technology, when coupled with system installation, provides significant reduction of the overall cost for groundwater remediation projects. We are pleased that we can transfer those savings to UPRR,” said Mr. Neno Duplancic, President of Locus Technologies.

Locus President Receives The Business Journal’s 1998 Silicon Valley Entrepreneurial Award, The Business Journal/Special Supplement

Founder of Locus Technologies has made his mark in the environmental cleanup arena

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif., 27 June 1998 — Entrepreneurial Award Finalist – Emerging Category

Mary Duan
Special to the Business Journal

 

When someone comes looking for the services of Locus Technologies, it is because they have a problem that company co-founder and CEO Neno Duplancic likens to cancer.
But it is not an anomaly of the human body that Locus seeks to cure. Rather, its target anomalies in the air, water, or soil that leads people to the Mountain View-based company.

“If you get to cancer early enough, there is a chance you will survive and get out of it. But if you let it go too long, your chances of survival are minimal,” Mr. Duplancic said. “It’s the same with environmental contamination. If you get to the source early and move aggressively to contain, chances are it would be a major headache and you won’t have to spend a lot of money to remediate. But if you wait until next quarter and then the next quarter, it’s going to cost more and more.” Locus Technologies was founded in April 1997, at a time when nobody, its founders included, thought it was a good time to start an environmental firm. Indeed, Locus found its origins in the failure of another environmental firm where Mr. Duplancic and the seven others who comprise Locus’ management team once worked. Two factors led to the rocky times for the environmental industry. First, environmental regulations that created significant market growth in the 1980s diminished demand in the 1990s.

When Congress enacted Superfund regulations in 1980, an army of engineers and geologists switched to environmental work But that work began to grind to a halt in the 1990s because while a lot of money had been spent investigating remediation, not all that much remediation actually took place.

Second, merger mania began sweeping through the industry.

Mr. Duplancic’s previous employer was acquired by a group of investors, whom he said underestimated the financial needs of the company while at the same time overestimating their management abilities.

“The company found itself in a serious financial crisis,” said Mr. Duplancic. “But we had a good team and good clients and we split to form the new company.”

Meanwhile, the previous employer fell into bankruptcy.

Mr. Duplancic founded Locus with one goal-engineer the lowest cost remedy at its clients’ sites while satisfying regulatory environmental standards. The company helps clients minimize environmental liability by using pure science and renegotiating site remedies with regulatory agencies.

Chevron Oil, for example, was facing a $45 million fee for remediation at the Purity Oil site, where companies dispose of used oil. Chevron officials were somewhat skeptical when Locus told them they could take a different approach.

After conducting studies, Locus was able to come up with a remedy that cost Chevron less than $10 million.

“Better, faster and cheaper. Everything starts with a single bore hole in the ground,” Mr. Duplancic said. “Clients hope we will hold their hands and get them out of trouble. They just want the cheapest and safest way out and that’s where we come into play.”

Mr. Duplancic gained his knowledge of the environmental industry during his years at IT Corp., which eventually became the largest environmental company in the United States, and at D’Appolonia Consulting Engineers in America and Europe. There, he was responsible for nuclear power plants and offshore platform projects in Belgium, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Germany, the Mediterranean and the Middle East.

Like many startups, Locus operated on a tight budget at its outset. Startup financing came from six of the founding partners and a Bank of America line of credit.

Mr. Duplancic said within its first two months, Locus landed several major contracts, negotiated favorable payment terms with its major client, and negotiated to rent office space from two major clients.

In its fifth month, Locus became profitable. Initial revenues for 1997 are estimated at $10 million.

Companies from Xerox to Schlumberger, which bought Fairchild Semiconductors and inherited its contaminated sites, have turned to Locus Technologies since its founding. In so doing, some of these companies have found Locus was able to solve problems that had confounded other environmental firms.

Xerox, for example, had been trying for some time to obtain a letter of closure from the Regional Water Quality Control Board for a site in Hayward it wanted to vacate.

When Xerox retained Locus, engineers conducted an environmental audit and found contaminants in a shallow groundwater aquifer and a small area of the unsaturated soil above the aquifer. The water contamination was not a threat to public water supplies, but the soil required remediation. Using a conventional method – a soil cap – would have required a maintenance lifetime of 200 years to keep the Environmental Protection Agency happy.

Using a new policy that was about to come into effect, as well as newer technology to reduce the soil contamination, Locus eliminated the need for a soil cap. Within three months after landing the project, Locus obtained the letter of closure for Xerox.

The Xerox project was Locus’ first job and it remains a favorite story of Mr. Duplancic’s.

“This was a case where no matter what Xerox did and how they did it, none of it made a difference because they couldn’t get that letter,” Mr. Duplancic said. “Xerox had used many consultants there, they called us on short notice and we were able to figure out how Xerox could use this new policy.”

Mr. Duplancic’s involvement with Schlumberger dates to 1982, when he was with a previous employer.

He and members of his team were retained by Fairchild Semiconductors to address the now-infamous South San Jose site, which at the time was considered to be a small project.

When Schlumberger acquired Fairchild, it also acquired the company’s problems, which snowballed so much that Mr. Duplancic’s team now manages all of Schlumberger’s contaminated sites in California and one in New York.

“They didn’t know at the time they had such a problem. But they are very responsible corporate citizens,” he said. “They are trying to prevent the spread of contaminants and we are applying some pretty exciting technologies.”

Tom Jones, who manages contaminated sites for Schlumberger, believes that not using Locus is a mistake most companies can’t afford to make.

“In environmental cleanup technology, disciplines are intertwined. I don’t know if it was by happenstance or design, but Locus has each of the disciplines represented in its group,” he said.

Barbara Jagiello, a San Francisco attorney who met Mr. Duplancic at a Croatian-American event, finds that people are drawn to Mr. Duplancic not only because of his impressive credentials, but because he doesn’t spend a lot of time talking about himself.

“He listens a lot and watches a lot and he seems to have a good sense of people and how they are likely to respond,” she said.

Mr. Duplancic is watching how his company is likely to grow in the coming years. Most likely, he said, expansion is in the future.

“We know what we do well and we are good at it,” he said. “Our goal is to put a couple of more points on the map, where our primary growth will come from, and then we will try to go international.”

Automatic Savings, Civil Engineering Magazine

Read the Press Release Here


Walnut Creek, Calif., 1 June 1998 — In the last several years, growth in the environmental remediation industry has slowed. One reason is that at many contaminated sites remedial construction activities have been completed and the operation and maintenance (O&M) phase has begun. However, this slow growth, accompanied by increased competition, does not necessarily translate into cost savings for the owners of contaminated sites with long term O&M requirements.
Long-term O&M costs often dwarf engineering and remedial construction costs, but they don’t have to. By negotiating with regulators for adequate cleanup standards, reducing labor through automation and standardizing environmental reporting and record keeping, site owners often can shut down a system early or reduce the long term operating costs of environmental treatment systems by 30% to 50%.

Construction of a $1 million groundwater treatment plant operated for 30 years or more, for example, typically would be preceded by five years of consulting, regulatory negotiation and engineering costs. These initial costs would total about $300,000. After construction, the O&M phase might continue for 30 years. If the initial O&M cost is $40,000 per year and the inflation rate is 3%, the true future cost of O&M exceeds $2 million, which is substantially higher than consulting, engineering and construction costs combined (see Remedy Total Cost). Even a 10% reduction in O&M costs can produce enormous savings in the long run. The following four strategies can help to lower overall O&M costs:

  • Negotiate with regulators to reduce O&M requirements
  • Design a system that will require less servicing
  • Automate the system so that human factors play a minimal role in routine tasks
  • Computerize environmental data management and reporting

The ability to influence overall project costs is greater at the early stages of development. The engineers and scientists involved in the project need to establish a scientific approach to determining when to shut down in situ remediation systems, such as groundwater treatment or soil vapor extraction processes. These processes typically provide an initial rapid decline in contaminant concentrations, followed by a gradual flattening of removal efficiency over time.
Contaminant levels eventually get so low that the system can no longer reduce them. In many cases, the contaminant concentration may be higher than the cleanup standard, but continued operation of a treatment process in this situation is unwarranted, wasteful and ineffective. No discernable benefit can be obtained.

A policy for shutting down a treatment process that is based on the rate of change of the concentration versus time could save millions of dollars in cleanup costs. This would be consistent with Californian’s Containment Zone Policy. The policy, adopted in October 1996, recognizes the futility of trying to remediate groundwater to drinking water standards without considering technological and economic limitations.

In addition, a shutdown standard based on science could justify an impracticability waiver from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, based on the inability of the system to achieve required cleanup levels using available remedial technology. This approach offers the owner an opportunity to shut down a system early and renegotiate sampling and reporting frequency. When a system can no longer significantly reduce the concentration of contaminants, groundwater concentrations change slowly. Frequent well sampling and monitoring are unjustified and wasteful.